First Quarter 2012
First Quarter 2012
Review and Outlook
Markets made significant gains in the first quarter of the year, making up for lost ground on the back of last year’s volatility. With the S&P 500 booking a gain of just over 12 percent in the quarter, financial markets have embraced a greater degree of confidence in the economy. Unlike last year, market action in 2012 has again begun to reflect fundamentals, rather than a volatile news flow and large degree of headline risk.
In the United States, economic fundamentals have continued to improve. Unemployment, which ended the quarter at 8.3 percent, has continued its decline at a modest pace. While a portion of this improvement reflects declining participation rates as the workforce shrinks due to demographic changes and discouraged workers, we do see things looking up overall. Various gauges of consumer sentiment and leading economic indicators have continued to advance as well, suggesting the recovery has gained a more solid footing.
The all-important housing market has shown some positive signs as well. Lower mortgage rates, thanks to the Federal Reserve’s Operation Twist, have helped housing affordability reach record levels. A turnaround in housing – and the pricing data suggests the market is bottoming – could provide tremendous momentum for the broader economy, via homebuilding and construction as well as lending in financial services.
The crisis in the euro zone subsided somewhat following the Greek bailout in early March. Aiding in this was the European Central Bank’s Long-Term Refinancing Operation, which injected liquidity into the European banking system, leading to a reduction in sovereign yields to more manageable levels. In addition, policymakers took steps toward expanding available bailout funds to further address the crisis. While the crisis will not come to a true end until structural reforms are embraced, the policy steps taken thus far did lessen the weight of the crisis on the U.S. stock market during the quarter. Time will tell whether the Europeans can come together for a lasting solution while still maintaining their currency union.
Meanwhile, we continue to see resource prices as a potential threat to the global economy. Supply constraints in the oil market have already begun to take a toll, with higher oil and gasoline prices affecting consumer spending and corporate profit margins. Geopolitical tensions, particularly the situation in Iran, threaten to exacerbate gains in oil prices in the short-term. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, appears incapable of fulfilling its traditional role as swing producer by meaningfully increasing production.
In this country, hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, has led to an eight-year high in domestic crude oil production and record natural gas output. Natural gas prices have dropped to their low levels in more than a decade as a result. Some advocates of the new technology have gone so far as to suggest fracking could lead the U.S. to energy independence. We disagree with this assessment.
The data suggests fracking requires much greater quantities of water than estimates allow for. Moreover, some leading fracking companies are cash flow negative after adjusting for the effects of asset sales, despite their huge production gains. At the end of the day, the lackluster economics of fracking mean that the technology will not change the underlying issue of resource scarcity and could even be dangerous in that it will delay America’s investment in renewable energies.
Against the backdrop of the improving, but still feeble economic recovery, the introduction of additional monetary stimulus remains a distinct possibility. If the recovery in the labor market begins to slow, or other areas of the economy show pronounced signs of weakness, we expect the Federal Reserve to initiate a third round of asset purchases, or QE3. With a weak recovery and rising resource prices, the economy is walking a thin line between inflation and deflation. Given the choice between the two, policymakers will likely favor labor market improvements over price stability and allow for inflation as the lesser of two evils.
Despite lower volatility and improving market sentiment, the materials sector showed signs of continued strain in the first quarter. Namely, the divergence between precious and base metals and the shares of companies that mine them, a trend, which began last year, continued through the early part of 2012. Mining increasingly scarce materials requires huge amounts of capital, and the decoupling of mining shares from the underlying metals reflects the risk that the financing necessary for developing new operations will not be accessible. Additionally, as materials become scarcer, the threat of foreign countries nationalizing their natural resources could harm multi-national mining companies. Accordingly, we have repositioned the investments in our Growth Portfolio in this sector, emphasizing the underlying metals while paring back on the mining company stocks.
First quarter 2012 was generally positive for dividend-paying stocks, following the hopeful pattern that emerged in the fourth quarter of 2011. The single-biggest positive remains corporate borrowing rates, which are still near their lowest point since the 1950s. The biggest negative are on-going economic and credit pressures from Europe, and the risk they’ll wash over to these shores.
Peak Resources and Energy Portfolio
Our Peak Resources and Energy Portfolio remains leveraged to the long-term trends of resource scarcity and the rising demands of an industrializing emerging world. While the long-term strategic outlook for this portfolio did not meaningfully change in the last quarter, we did make several adjustments to better address our objectives in the face of an ever-evolving market.
In the energy sector, we remain skeptical of the benefits of hydraulic fracturing, as mentioned above in our market outlook. We believe fracking requires much greater quantities of water than estimates currently allow for, which ultimately will drive up costs and drive down estimates of recoverable energy resources. With this in mind, we added positions in smaller energy exploration and production companies, whose healthier reserve positions should allow for considerably higher production growth than the large integrated oil companies will generate.
In the materials sector, we exited two mining positions on mounting political concerns. Both base metals and rare earths are critical for the development of renewable energy infrastructures. And as policymakers around the world come to this realization, deposits of these critical resources come under the growing threat of nationalization. We also see higher mining taxes and the potential for outright bans on exporting critical resources as likely milestones ahead in a resource-scarce world, threatening many mining companies’ businesses. To lower risk, when possible, at this time we prefer owning the underlying metals and resources as opposed to the companies that mine them.
However, at the same time we believe that there is significant underlying value in the shares of many of the miners, including junior gold miners who possess enviable deposits and could become attractive takeover targets. Our investments in the sector now are devoted to the stocks that belong to the select group of mining companies that should be able to meaningfully grow production in response to rising demand.